Gandhi and the Christians

Gandhi used to read the Bible daily. He highly admired Jesus and tried to follow His teachings. One day, he was asked why, if he liked Jesus so much, he didn’t become a Christian. Gandhi’s answer was simple: “Christians.”

When he was studying in Great Britain, he got to know many people who claimed to be Christians, but were that in name only. They didn’t live as Christ lived. I don’t know all the things he saw them doing, but it was enough to make him not want to be a Christian.

To be honest, I’ve never liked his answer. It’s not just that it’s an indictment of how Christians act. That’s a topic for another time. It’s the logical fallacy of the statement, which is, in essence: If these people believe this thing and act the way they do, then the thing they believe in or purportedly believe in must be false.

I’ve heard this argument from others, often on the CNN forums on religious articles I sometimes visit. It usually goes something like, “The Crusaders were Christians. So were the Spaniards who ravaged and enslaved Latin America,” along with other examples. I’m not going to defend what these people did; some of it was reprehensible and done under the guise of Christianity, but without the spirit of Christianity.

That said, other people’s actions don’t mean Jesus was wrong in what He preached. It doesn’t mean He’s not worth following or that He has no power to change your life. All it means is that these people, for whatever reason, have either been severely misled or have chosen to use the guise of Christianity for their own ends. Neither of those makes Him less powerful or less worthy of our service. It simply makes those people poor ambassadors.

The other side of the argument is that there are people of every major religion who have been murderers or terrorists. Stalin and Mao were atheists and killed millions of their own countrymen. By this logic, atheism is wrong because some people who were atheists were mass murderers. The Thugee cult in India is the most famous assassin’s guild in the world. And, of course, there are Islamic extremists who blow themselves up in the name of their religion.

What people do has no bearing on either God’s existence or His goodness. Imagine you got a kitten and tried to train it. Rather than behaving, the kitten never uses the litter box, hisses and scratches at you when you get near, and bites the neighborhood children when she gets out. Then your neighbors decide that you must either not exist or not be a very good person because your cat is awful.

Also, if we flip the argument over, then a person doing good logically means the reason they’re doing the good is correct. Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and atheists can all give to the poor, be kind to children, be fair and just, etc. It doesn’t mean all these religions are true, just that their adherents are trying to live out their values the best way they know how.

Now, it’s true that Christians ought to live like Jesus did. We ought to love our neighbors, not judge others, and have peace through our trials. All that’s true. Whether we live up to our end of the bargain or not, though, He has lived up to His end.

Advertisements

4 comments on “Gandhi and the Christians

  1. annetbell says:

    Lovely message…namaste. . . .Anne talesalongtheway.com

  2. ashokjan24 says:

    To each his own but I dont agree with equating religious murders with those committed by atheists. Atheism was not the driving force for murders committed by Stalin and Mao. But crusades were committed in the name of religion. I’d any day be scared of a religious person than an atheist.

    • I would say that atheism often becomes a worship of self. If there is no higher power, then what do most people treat as a priority?
      There’s also a huge difference between a religious person actually following the beliefs of their religion, a religious person who has been seriously misled, and a person using religion as a license to do what they want. That last is not really different from what Mao and Stalin did in using the state as an excuse. For the Crusaders and Conquistadors, I would guess that many of them fell into the second or third categories. The core beliefs of many of the world’s largest religions, Christianity included, preach peace. Because of this, I can understand being afraid of a person masquerading under a religious banner, but to lump all religious people together seems like an undeserved blanket judgment.
      Thanks for commenting.

      • ashokjan24 says:

        I don’t say all religious folks are bad and all theists are good. But the fact is religious doctrines even though they may preach peace, often breeds intolerance to other people’s beliefs and most times goes overboard resulting in extremist behaviour. I come from India and I’ve seen riots happening for silly religious reasons.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s